[GHC] #8631: Need ImpredicativeTypes for GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving?

26 Dec 2013

      #8631: Need ImpredicativeTypes for GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving?
------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  goldfire          |             Owner:
           Type:  bug               |            Status:  new
       Priority:  normal            |         Milestone:
      Component:  Compiler          |           Version:  7.7
       Keywords:                    |  Operating System:  Unknown/Multiple
   Architecture:  Unknown/Multiple  |   Type of failure:  None/Unknown
     Difficulty:  Unknown           |         Test Case:
     Blocked By:                    |          Blocking:
Related Tickets:                    |
------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Nathan Howell posts this code:

 {{{
 {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
 {-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}
 {-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
 {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}
 -- Uncomment to compile on GHC 7.8
 -- {-# LANGUAGE ImpredicativeTypes #-}

 module Repro where

 import Control.Monad.Trans.Cont
 import Control.Monad.Trans.State.Lazy

 newtype AnyContT m a = AnyContT { unAnyContT :: forall r . ContT r m a }

 class MonadAnyCont b m where
   anyContToM :: (forall r . (a -> b r) -> b r) -> m a

 instance MonadAnyCont b (AnyContT m) where
   anyContToM _ = error "foo"

 data DecodeState = DecodeState

 newtype DecodeAST a = DecodeAST { unDecodeAST :: AnyContT (StateT
 DecodeState IO) a }
   deriving (MonadAnyCont IO)
 }}}

 Compiling on HEAD produces

 {{{
 [1 of 1] Compiling Repro            ( repro.hs, interpreted )

 repro.hs:24:13:
     Cannot instantiate unification variable ‛b0’
     with a type involving foralls:
       (forall r. (a1 -> IO r) -> IO r) -> DecodeAST a1
       Perhaps you want ImpredicativeTypes
     In the expression:
         GHC.Prim.coerce
           (anyContToM ::
              (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r)
              -> AnyContT (StateT DecodeState IO) a) ::
           forall (a :: *).
           (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r) -> DecodeAST a
     In an equation for ‛anyContToM’:
         anyContToM
           = GHC.Prim.coerce
               (anyContToM ::
                  (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r)
                  -> AnyContT (StateT DecodeState IO) a) ::
               forall (a :: *).
               (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r) -> DecodeAST a
 Failed, modules loaded: none.
 }}}

 Two questions:

 1. Should we require users to specify !ImpredicativeTypes here? Or, should
 the !GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving mechanism (which sometimes is
 impredicative) just assume the extension?

 2. Can we improve the error message?

 I'd like to note that the original example really ''does'' require
 impredicativity -- the question is whether and how to bother the user with
 this technicality.

 Small program note: I've done a lot of stuff with
 !GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving lately but am on holiday until Jan. 6, so
 don't expect responses!

--
Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8631
GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

GHC

tags

participants (1)