Re: [GHC] #393: functions without implementations

#393: functions without implementations -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: c_maeder | Owner: simonpj Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: _|_ Component: Compiler (Type | Version: None checker) | Keywords: Resolution: None | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Difficulty: Moderate (less Type of failure: None/Unknown | than a day) Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by simonmar): I think that this is another kind of "deferred error", in the same sense of `-fdefer-type-errors`, and there are lots of other kinds of errors that we want to defer (e.g. out-of-scope identifiers). So all I'm suggesting is that we should bear this in mind, and perhaps use a consistent naming convention for flags, e.g. this particular one could be `-fdefer-missing- decl-errors`, which would eventually become part of `-fdefer-renamer- errors`. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/393#comment:19 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
participants (1)
-
GHC