#4834: Implement Functor => Applicative => Monad Hierarchy (aka AMP phase 3) -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: gidyn | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: libraries/base | Version: 7.0.1 Resolution: | Keywords: report- Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | impact Type of failure: None/Unknown | Architecture: Blocked By: | Unknown/Multiple Related Tickets: #8004 | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: Phab:D13 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@…>): In [changeset:"a741e69a230eb6d6e3373ad1fbe53c73b5f95077/ghc"]: {{{ #!CommitTicketReference repository="ghc" revision="a741e69a230eb6d6e3373ad1fbe53c73b5f95077" Provide default implementation of `Monad(return)` This was dropped last-minute from d94de87252d0fe2ae97341d186b03a2fbe136b04 (re #4834) together with the default implementation for `(>>)` (see 65f887e1a0d864526f6a2609a3afc2c151c25e38 for explanation). However, the risk of accidental mutually recursive definitions of `return`/`pure` is rather low as unlike with the `(>>) = (*>)` default, any cyclic definitions would necessarily wind up being new ones, rather than changing the semantics for old operations and introducing bottoms. On the other hand, not having the default method implementation in place in GHC 7.10 would complicate/delay any future attempt to clean-up the `Monad`-class. This finally allows (for `base >= 4.8`) to define a F/A/M instance-chain with the following minimal definitions (while ignoring that `return` is still a class-method in `Monad`) instance Functor M where fmap = ... instance Applicative M where pure = ... (<*>) = ... instance Monad M where (>>=) = ... Reviewed By: ekmett, austin Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D647 }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4834#comment:10> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler