- Glasgow-haskell-users

RE: GHC and readline
by Simon Marlow 16 Sep '02

16 Sep '02

> At 2002-09-15 22:48, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > > >Well, it depends on whether this code makes use of the > >readline functionality or not. If, say, you are just using > >GetOpt from "util", there is no need for you to make your > >program GPL, only because Readline happens to be in the same > >package. > > It's not a problem with the new hierarchy, but formerly if I used > "package util" then I'd have to link in libreadline, and then > I would be > subject to the terms of its license. > > Or would the linker not include any libreadline code in that case? Readline is now in a package on its own in the HEAD. i.e. our next major release will contain a completely separate readline package. The license status of the readline package itself is not clear; certainly if you statically link to readline your program is only distributable under the GPL. However, if you dynamically link against readline, then you could conceivably follow the Linux kernel attitude and not GPL your code (although some at the FSF disagree with this interpretation of the GPL). Currently, if you use package util but don't import Readline, you are not affected by the GPL. None of the libraries we distribute indirectly depends on Readline. Cheers, Simon

2 1

Re: GHC and readline
by Ashley Yakeley 16 Sep '02

16 Sep '02

At 2002-09-15 22:48, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: >Well, it depends on whether this code makes use of the >readline functionality or not. If, say, you are just using >GetOpt from "util", there is no need for you to make your >program GPL, only because Readline happens to be in the same >package. It's not a problem with the new hierarchy, but formerly if I used "package util" then I'd have to link in libreadline, and then I would be subject to the terms of its license. Or would the linker not include any libreadline code in that case? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

2 1

meta-haskell-branch
by Saswat Anand 16 Sep '02

16 Sep '02

Hi I am trying to compile the meta-haskell-branch of ghc from cvs. I get the following error messages. Please help me with some hints. Thanks, Saswat # when I do ./configure in fptools directory, It ends with the following error: configuring in ghc running /bin/sh ./configure --prefix=/root/fptools/prefix --cache-file=.././config.cache -- srcdir=. ./configure: ./configure: No such file or directory configure: error: ./configure failed for ghc # when I went ahead to do ./make in fptools dir, it dies with: echo '#!/bin/sh' >>ghc-inplace echo exec /root/fptools/ghc/compiler/ghc-5.05 '-B/root/fptools' '"$@"'>>ghc-inplace chmod 755 ghc-inplace ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ==fptools== make all -wr; in /root/fptools/ghc/rts ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ../../ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace -optc-O -optc-Wall -optc-W -optc-Wstrict-prot otypes -optc-Wmissing-prototypes -optc-Wmissing-declarations -optc-Winline - optc-Waggregate-return -optc-Wbad-function-cast -optc-I../includes -optc-I. -optc-Iparallel -optc-DCOMPILING_RTS -optc-fomit-frame-pointer -ldl -O2 -sta tic -c Adjustor.c -o Adjustor.o make[2]: *** [Adjustor.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/fptools/ghc' make: *** [all] Error 1

1 0

GHC and readline
by Ashley Yakeley 16 Sep '02

16 Sep '02

At 2002-09-15 16:43, Glynn Clements wrote: >Readline is a GNU package, available from ftp.gnu.org. > >However, note that it is GPL (not LGPL), so it's only legally usable >in GPL'd programs. Eeesh! So this means any GHC code that uses package util (or data, which depends on it) must be distributed GPL. Would it be possible to isolate readline-using code in a separate package? I'm pretty sure I don't need readline functionality for what I'm doing, but I do need the "data" package... Currently I distribute the source code for my HBase library under LGPL. But because HBase binaries would typically include readline code, users of my binaries would be obliged to comply with the GPL. -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

2 1

Re: GHC and readline
by Ashley Yakeley 16 Sep '02

16 Sep '02

At 2002-09-15 18:06, Ashley Yakeley wrote: >but I do need the "data" package... Looks like I don't after all, with the new hierarchical module system... -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

1 0

Re: Bug in GHC for MacOSX 10.2?
by Ashley Yakeley 15 Sep '02

15 Sep '02

At 2002-09-15 06:45, Sven Panne wrote: >That buglet has already been fixed in 5.04.1, for a quick fix you can simply >nuke the 'const' from the declarations of GHCziTopHandler_runIO_closure >and GHCziTopHandler_runNonIO_closure in RtsAPI.h Thanks, that seems to have fixed that problem. But now I'm getting this: ghc -package lang -package data Test.o libHBase.a -o Test ld: can't locate file for: -lreadline It turns out data depends on util, which has this: extra_libraries = ["HSutil_cbits", "readline", "curses"], Does Apple provide a readline, or do I need to get one from somewhere? I think my old installation had a libreadline, but I don't remember where it came from... -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

2 1

Bug in GHC for MacOSX 10.2?
by Ashley Yakeley 15 Sep '02

15 Sep '02

I get this when trying to compile with the new GHC 5.04 for 10.2: ghc -fglasgow-exts -fallow-undecidable-instances -fno-implicit-prelude -package lang -package data -i. -c DumpRDF.hs -o DumpRDF.o /tmp/ghc22945.hc:429: conflicting types for `GHCziTopHandler_runIO_closure' /usr/local/lib/ghc-5.04/include/RtsAPI.h:125: previous declaration of `GHCziTopHandler_runIO_closure' >From the .hc: EC_(GHCziTopHandler_runIO_closure); >From StgMacros.h: #define EC_ extern StgClosure >From RtsAPI.h extern DLL_IMPORT const StgClosure GHCziTopHandler_runIO_closure; The C compiler seems to object to the difference in 'constness'... -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

2 1

RE: Feature request for ghci
by Simon Marlow 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

> Assume this situation > > Test/ > Foo.hs <- this is module Test.Foo > Bar.hs <- this is module Test.Bar > > Test.Foo imports Test.Bar > > If I cd into Test, and do ghci Bar.hs everything is fine, module > Test.Bar is loaded. > > If I do ghci Foo.hs it complains about not being able to find > Test.Bar. > > My request is that ghci looks "up" in the hierarchy and > assumes that the > user wants too look for modules in .. if the module Test.Foo > lies in the > file Foo.hs > > Of course this will not always work, symlinks and other things, but it > would be useful. Now I have to do "cd ..; ghci -i. Test.Foo" instead. I'm sceptical about this feature. As Hal mentioned, you can always do 'ghci -i.. Foo.hs', but even that is slightly dodgy because then you have two overlapping directories on the import path. The reason you can use Foo.hs is because it is a root module, and root modules are allowed to have filenames which differ from their module names. Suppose you try to refer to it as simply "Foo", making sure we're in a different directory entirely: $ cd <elsewhere>; ghci -i<path>/Test Foo ... <path>/Test/Foo.hs: file name does not match module name `Foo' The only "right" way to use a hierarchical module is from the root of the tree. Cheers, Simon

1 0

RE: GHC for Linux/PPC on Mac?
by Simon Marlow 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

> Is there such a thing? planned? > I've seen nothing on the download page. People have muttered about it from time to time, but we don't have an official port. If you're interested, take a look at the porting section in the building guide, here: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/building/sec-porting-ghc.htm l and feel free to ask questions, either here or on cvs-ghc(a)haskell.org. Cheers, Simon

1 0

GHC for Linux/PPC on Mac?
by Till Mossakowski 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

Is there such a thing? planned? I've seen nothing on the download page. Till -- Till Mossakowski Phone +49-421-218-4683 Dept. of Computer Science Fax +49-421-218-3054 University of Bremen till(a)tzi.de P.O.Box 330440, D-28334 Bremen http://www.tzi.de/~till

2 1