- Glasgow-haskell-users

RE: Install Shield Version of GHC 5.0 for Win?
by Simon Peyton-Jones 13 Jul '01

13 Jul '01

Yes! We do now have an installshield for Win32, including ghci, that has the new property that a) you don't need to install anything else b) even if you have installed other things (notably cygwin), ghc won't be confused by their presence Today we will put out a "thrill-seekers release" for Win32. By which I mean that it'll be a release of the HEAD of the tree, which hasn't been through the usual stabilisation process before release, so some dark corners may not work as advertised, and we won't advise gettting rid of your trusty 4.08 until we put out a full 5.02. Simon -----Original Message----- From: Christian Lescher [mailto:christian@lescher.de] Sent: 12 July 2001 20:57 To: glasgow-haskell-users(a)haskell.org Subject: Install Shield Version of GHC 5.0 for Win? Is there an InstallShield Version of GHC 5.0 for Windows in preparation? Will it be available soon? AFAIK, GHC 4.08.2 is still the latest binary distribution for Win. Christian

1 0

RE: Problem with .ghci (fwd)
by Simon Marlow 12 Jul '01

12 Jul '01

> Quite. I don't think there is a solution that's going to work > everywhere > and the current version is simple and effective for most > people. I fixed > my InteractiveUI.hs to ignore g+w if the group that owns the > file is my > group, but that's completely wrong at sites which have some users in > shared groups. I guess there's no reliable general test for a > UPG except > with local knowledge. There's certainly no fix for the shared > directory > situation that isn't also going to let dubious .ghci files through > elsewhere. > > Unfortunately I can't think of any better option than to > leave it as it > is with a note in the manual indicating the default > permissions-checking > behaviour is and where to look in the source to change it if > necessary. To subvert GHCi's paranoia, just put this in your $HOME/.ghci: :def source IO.readFile :source ./.ghci (for extra marks, you could make it check that `pwd` /= $HOME, that you hadn't already loaded ./.ghci). Cheers, Simon PS. quite embarrassingly, it appears that GHCi just goes ahead and reads $HOME/.ghci even if the permissions are unsafe. Time for another release methinks, before GHCi gets its first CERT advisory :)

2 1

Re: Trying to build HDIRECT with ghc-5.00.2
by Sigbjorn Finne 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

Adrian Hey ahey(a)iee.org writes: > *** ghc Newbie Alert ** > I suppose the first question i should ask is will the current version > (hdirect 0.17) work with ghc-5.00.2 or am I wasting my time? > I've found I have to put '-package lang' in the ghc options to get > the installation to to work at all, but it stops eventually complaining about > unrecognised flag -K2m (obsolete presumably). Is there a ghc-5.00.2 > alternative? At this point I've given up because I don't really understand > what I'm doing or what are appropriate settings for all those > xyz_HC_OPTS in the makefiles or what else might need changing. > > Any advice? hi, the CVS repository version of HDirect is mostly(*) compatible with ghc-5.00.2, so I'd suggest giving it a go instead of 0.17. The repository hangs off the fptools/ one in fptools/hdirect. --sigbjorn (*) - ghc-5.00.2 give Int.sizeofInt{8,...} the type Int32; HDirect generated sources assume Word32 (as it should be). => you may need to tweak the generated code in a select few places to make ghc-5.00.2 happy.

1 0

RE: Problem with .ghci (fwd)
by Simon Peyton-Jones 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

| explicitly tell ghci that they're okay! Hand-holding w.r.t. | 'insecure' file permissions has a nasty habit of becoming a | nuisance in unusual cases the original authors hadn't thought of. :-( Constructive suggestions for how to improve are welcome. What we are trying to avoid is obvious trojan horses, where X can persuade Y's ghci to do rm *.*. This is bad. Simon

3 2

RE: Regexps
by Simon Marlow 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

> ["1,0,0,0","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","", > "","","","","","","","","","",""] > > ie the right answer, and 28 other empty answers. > > The documentation says > > "Note that there may be more components in the returned list than were > in the pattern, and that any component which either matched the empty > string or wasn't matched at all (because it was part of an > optional part > of the pattern), will be empty." > > Does this mean I had 28 matches with the empty string? No, it means there are more components in the returned list than in your original pattern, and you should ignore the extra ones. This is because GNU regex doesn't tell us how many components are actually returned, as I recall. > Why are they > returned? Will I always have to filter all these null strings out of > every result? Will the result I want always be first? Yes, no(*), and yes. (*) don't filter out the null strings, just strip the extra ones from the tail of the returned list. Remember that some of the components may legitimately be empty, for example if one of the components in your pattern was optional (eg. "a(bc)?d"). Cheers, Simon

1 0

Regexps
by Amanda Clare 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

Hi, I'd like to use regular expressions in my code, so I looked at the ghc documentation on this library and it doesn't say much. RegexString looks great but I don't know how to use it. Some examples would be greatly appreciated! Regex itself has even less documentation. From RegexString: "mkRegex makes a regular expression with the default options (multi-line, case-sensitive), whereas mkRegexWithOpts takes the values for these options as parameteres. The syntax of regular expressions is otherwise that of Perl." Then what's wrong with let exp = mkRegex "^class\(\[(.*)\]," in This would be the Perl syntax for the regexp. It says ghc -package text -c -o RegT.o RegT.hs RegT.hs:13: error in character literal I checked and it doesn't like the escaped ( [ and ]. So how do I escape them? The unescaped inner round brackets mean that I want to collect the result of this match, whereas the escaped brackets mean that these are actual characters I want to match. My text to match looks like this: class([1,0,0,0],"METABOLISM"). class([1,1,0,0],"amino-acid metabolism"). class([1,1,1,0],"amino-acid biosynthesis"). Amanda -- Amanda Clare http://users.aber.ac.uk/ajc99/ Tel: +44 (0)1970 621922 Fax: +44 (0)1970 622455 Dept. of Computer Science, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB

2 2

Trying to build HDIRECT with ghc-5.00.2
by Adrian Hey 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

*** ghc Newbie Alert ** I suppose the first question i should ask is will the current version (hdirect 0.17) work with ghc-5.00.2 or am I wasting my time? I've found I have to put '-package lang' in the ghc options to get the installation to to work at all, but it stops eventually complaining about unrecognised flag -K2m (obsolete presumably). Is there a ghc-5.00.2 alternative? At this point I've given up because I don't really understand what I'm doing or what are appropriate settings for all those xyz_HC_OPTS in the makefiles or what else might need changing. Any advice? Thanks -- Adrian Hey

1 0

test, ping
by Richard Uhtenwoldt 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

I've got the 'welcome' message: Welcome to the glasgow-haskell-users mailing list! Please save this message for future reference. Thank you. but no post and its been over a month. is the list dead?

1 0

Internet FORUM XXI
by web-forum-xxi＠addr.com 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

Dear Madam / Sir, We invite you kindly to use the broad capabilities of Internet FORUM XXI - a Web-based forum application for efficient project communication with your customers. For more details, please click on http://www.web-forum-xxi.addr.com Best wishes, Internet FORUM XXI mailto:web-forum-xxi@addr.com

1 0

Problem with .ghci (fwd)
by Jose Emilio Labra Gayo 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

I have been playing (for the first time) with ghci and it seems to work. However, if I write my own ".ghci", I obtain: ... Loading package std ... linking ... done *** WARNING: ./.ghci is writable by someone else, IGNORING! After that, it works, but ignores the options that I have set in .ghci NOTE1: I have built my system 2 times (firstly with ghc-4.08 to obtain ghc-5.02 (non interactive) and secondly, with ghc-5.02 again to obtain the interactive version. NOTE2: The contents of the .ghci file by now are: :set +s Best regards, Jose Labra

3 3