You probably want to compile locally, e.g. with Vagrant, and then send the binary "into the cloud"
Tom
El May 25, 2014, a las 2:36, harry
Simon Marlow-7 wrote
Is it just shortage of space, or is there anything else that pushes you towards DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS=NO? Isn't disk space cheap?
Disc space is prohibitively expensive for zero-budget open source projects deployed to the free tier of cloud computing providers.
We typically get 1Gb for everything, including GHC, third-party libraries, our own code, and data. A full install of GHC is nearly 1Gb by itself.
-- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Future-of-DYNAMIC-GHC-PROGRAMS-tp574979... Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users