Hello kyra, Friday, February 24, 2006, 12:37:02 AM, you wrote:
i prefer to see the asm code. this may be because of better high-level optimization strategies (reusing fib values). the scheme about i say will combine advantages of both worlds k> no strategies, plain exponential algorithm,
yes, the ocaml compiler works better with stack. but i sure that in most cases gcc will outperform ocaml because it has large number of optimizations which is not easy to implement (unrolling, instruction scheduling and so on) k> also, Clean is *EXACTLY* in line with ocaml. This is interesting, k> because Clean is so much similar to Haskell. clean differs from Haskell in support of unique types and strictness annotations. the last is slowly migrates into GHC in form of shebang patters, but i think that it is a half-solution. i mentioned in original letter my proposals to add strictness annotations to function types declarations and to declare strict datastructures, such as "![Int]" -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com