
6 May
2002
6 May
'02
6:44 a.m.
Why is it GHC "5.02.2", "5.03" etc.? Wouldn't it be easier with "5.2.2", "5.3"?
I don't know, probably historical reasons: as far as I can remember, GHC's version numbers always had two digits after the decimal point. For historians, here is the announcement of the first release of GHC (0.06) archived thanks to Google: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=16945.9203281558%40dcs.glasgow.ac.u k&output=gplain Cheers, Simon