Christian Maeder wrote:
Did someone run the test-suite of the binary distributions?
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.6/ghc-6.6-ppc-apple-darwin.tar.gz http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.6/ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
I've build a (ppc-) mac-distribution from sources and my results are shown below.
I had the following 3 unexpected failures under linux, too (by using "make TEST_HC=<installed ghc>" and the <installed ghc> was from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.6/ghc-6.6-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2)
cg058(ghci)
We also have cg058(ghci) failing on x86, I think it just runs out of time. We should make this test a bit quicker.
ghcpkg01(normal) ghcpkg03(normal)
Any idea why these are failing for you?
I thought the failure signals002(ghci) was related to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.glasgow.user/10947 In fact, I needed to kill the ghc-process to continue the tests.
The test files cc004.hs and ffi012.hs failed with several messages of the form:
calling convention not supported on this architecture: stdcall When checking declaration: foreign import stdcall safe "wrapper" wrap_f :: F -> IO (FunPtr F)
However, they did not make it into the summary
They are probably expected failures for you.
Cheers Christian
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Oct 23 14:54:15 CEST 2006 1455 total tests, which gave rise to 6441 test cases, of which 0 caused framework failures 1126 were skipped
5242 expected passes 55 expected failures 3 unexpected passes 15 unexpected failures
Unexpected passes: barton-mangler-bug(optasm) cholewo-eval(optasm,profasm)
Unexpected failures: barton-mangler-bug(opt) cabal02(normal) cg058(ghci) conc019(opt,profasm) conc024(opt) ffi009(ghci) forkprocess01(ghci) galois_raytrace(opt,prof) ghcpkg01(normal) ghcpkg03(normal) joao-circular(prof,profasm) signals002(ghci)
some of those could be floating-point differences. In any case, it would be good to investigate all of them and get any expected failures registered properly in the testsuite. Can you (or someone else) take a look and find out why each of them is failing? Cheers, Simon