Re: Version control systems

you don't use local branches? On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:

...

One way that it is worse is that you will get a lot more "automatic merge" commits when you pull changes from the central repo into a repo in which you have local commits. I don't think that there is anything bad about these, as such; they're just noise in the history. (I'm not sure if it's possible to automatically rebase these away, or something?).

I'm not sure if this is what you want but I always use git pull --rebase when I'm pulling to have my local commits lie on top of the one in the published repo.

-- Johan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users