Kenny Chamber writes:
How long after posting should it take for a message to appear on the
list?
It should be pretty fast, but some lists moderate posts by
non-subscribers. Could this be your problem?
For timing, we could look at your headers:
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:33:39 +0300
From: Kenny Chamber
You sent it today, at 07:33:39 +0300 (4:33 UTC). Early bird, huh?
Received: from [195.190.104.65] (spb-195-190-104-65.sovintel.ru
[195.190.104.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail2.hqhost.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBG4Xgt8098072
for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:44 GMT
5 seconds later, it is at mail2.hqhost.net, presumably your outgoing
mail server.
Received: from mail2.hqhost.net (mail2.hqhost.net [64.237.37.220])
by www.haskell.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD51368816
for ;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:21:54 -0500 (EST)
www.haskell.org gets it the day before, but is on the American east
coast. I make it 4:21 UTC, though, so one of you isn't running NTP
like he or she should.
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:33:52 +0100
I don't know who adds this.
Received: from haskell.cs.yale.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by www.haskell.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 50D48368835; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:21:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bugs.haskell.org ([128.36.229.215]:53008 helo=www.haskell.org)
(So - what's *really* the name of this computer?)
by eik.ii.uib.no with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1CenKp-0002qk-8z
for ketil+haskell@ii.uib.no; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:33:51 +0100
Ends up in my inbox at 05:33:51, subtract one hour if you want UTC.
The full trip done in twelwe seconds. If we trust the timestamps to
have that good resolution.
-kzm
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
