I'm not sure what you are suggesting here. Can you be more explicit? | -----Original Message----- | From: Isaac Dupree [mailto:isaacdupree@charter.net] | Sent: 09 August 2007 10:51 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: GHC Users | Subject: Re: wondering about -ddump-parsed, rn | | Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > -ddump-parsed shows the program after parsing. All operator application are parsed *left- | associative* with one precedence. Then the renamer re-associates them to respect precedence and | associativity. | > | > So, no, -ddump-parsed will definitely not give syntactically valid Haskell. -ddump-rn probably will | though. | | yes, in that case, would anyone mind if I find an easy way to change GHC | to parenthesize those non-infix uses of operators? :) hmm... maybe _I_ | would mind, since it makes "what GHC is doing" just a tiny bit less | transparent to the user of -ddump-{rn,parsed}. :-) | | Isaac