2 Jun
2005
2 Jun
'05
5:11 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:03:26PM -0400, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
Any reason the libaries don't define:
class HasNull a where null::a->Bool class HasEmpty a where empty::a
I find that I sometimes switch between using lists, sets, or tables as my collection type and the forced import qualifification for generic collection operations seems annoying.
HasEmpty should be a superclass of Monoid. I have wanted that split out on various occasions. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈