8 Sep
2010
8 Sep
'10
3:55 a.m.
Mitar I'm afraid I didn't understand your questions well enough to answer them. But it'd be worth reading http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.2/html/users_guide/other-type-extension... | > It's not trivial to add, but not really hard either. Has anyone else been | bitten by this? | | It would be great if it would be added. Obviously I am for it. ;-) | | I think n should be scoped for the whole the class definition, | everywhere, not just parameter and return values types. If somebody | would define the same name for it for some local definition, GHC | should make a "shadowing a variable" warning. I do rather agree. Let's see if others do. Simon