
7 Mar
2012
7 Mar
'12
8:40 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 20:01, Johan Tibell
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Allbery
wrote: I think the original type signature is needed to figure it out. In the earlier example it indicated ghc drilling down into the type (a tuple) and determining the strictness of the constituents.
I parenthesis were for tuples I would never expect to see e.g. U(L).
Right, the tuple was just that example.
Data F = F Int
would give you something that could produce U(L), the U for the F constructor, the L for the contained Int. -- brandon s allbery allbery.b@gmail.com wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms