let b=a in e | -----Original Message----- | From: David Sabel [mailto:dsabel@stud.uni-frankfurt.de] | Sent: 03 January 2003 15:22 | To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Translating seq into Core | | Thanks for that answer. I suggested something like that. | Can you explain me, how the Haskell-expression | case a of b -> e (in Haskell, not strict, right?) | ist translated to Core? | | | | | > seq a b = case a of { DEFAULT -> b } | > | > In Core, case is always strict. | > | > | -----Original Message----- | > | From: David Sabel [mailto:dsabel@stud.uni-frankfurt.de] | > | Sent: 03 January 2003 14:11 | > | To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | > | Subject: Translating seq into Core | > | | > | Hallo, | > | | > | my question ist, how the "seq" operator is translated into the | > | GHC-core-language? | > | | > | I had suspected, the core-language has a special strictness-operator, | > but I | > | saw, that this is not the case. | > | | > | | > | David Sabel | > | JWGU Frankfurt | > | | > | _______________________________________________ | > | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | > | Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | > | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users | > _______________________________________________ | > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users | _______________________________________________ | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users