9 Mar
2009
9 Mar
'09
11:40 p.m.
On 2009 Mar 9, at 9:32, Claus Reinke wrote:
One way out would be to treat the whole mutual recursion as a single entity, either implicitly, as I indicated, or explicitly, as I interpret Brandon's somewhat ambiguous comment. In other words, the peel/unroll limits would apply to a whole group of mutually
Sorry, yes, I intended that the unrolling applied explicitly to a group of mutually recursive functions. I'm not sure if the unroll/ peel counts should be multiplied by the number of functions, though. -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH