This doesn't affect the source snapshots, only the Linux/x86 binaries. I think there are more people using the sources and the Linux/x86_64 binaries. Cheers, Simon On 09 December 2005 10:26, Frederik Eaton wrote:
Would I be the only user of the nightly binary snapshots?
Frederik
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:23:16AM -0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
The nightly binary snapshots for x86/Linux are currently hard-wired to use gcc-3.4.3, because I occasionally change gcc versions to make sure things are still working. I'll change it back to gcc. To workaround it you can add '-pgmc gcc' to the command line.
Cheers, Simon
On 09 December 2005 03:26, Frederik Eaton wrote:
Does this depend on a certain version of gcc?
$ ghc -M --make Matrix.hs -o matrix Chasing modules from: Matrix.hs [1 of 2] Compiling Fu.Prepose ( Fu/Prepose.hs, Fu/Prepose.o ) ghc-6.5.20051207: could not execute: gcc-3.4.3
I'm wondering why it is trying to execute something which isn't in my path...
Frederik
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:51:19AM -0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Simon fixed this recently. The GHC HEAD build will not re-link with --make if none of the object files have changed.
Simon
-----Original Message----- From: glasgow-haskell-users-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Frederik Eaton Sent: 04 December 2005 00:46 To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org Subject: recommended build system
Hi all,
I'm looking for a build system for my projects which will correctly handle all of ghc's dependencies. I.e. every time I ask it to rebuild an output file, it will only do the minimum amount of compilation necessary. This is important to me because "ghc --make" and cabal currently (AFAICT) will always relink an executable even when it is not necessary to do so; thus if I have a project with a bunch of libraries and executables, the cost of making a small modification and recompiling is very high, and it becomes hard to maintain focus on my projects after the initial design phase. I've just been playing around with GNU coreutils and was impressed with how well the build system works, and how fast the recompilation goes.
Anyway, the system that darcs uses seems to work pretty well, should I copy that, or do people recommend other alternatives?
Frederik _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users