28 Aug
2006
28 Aug
'06
9:16 a.m.
Hi
If there is no better solution, would it be possible on failure to somehow enter a critical section and repeat the call that caused the failure and then call get last error and exit the critical section so that normal calls would be fast but only failed calls would be slow?
No. This isn't Haskell - this is the Windows API. Some functions i.e. DeleteFile might fail differently different times round, plus you could cause unimaginable damage by arbitrarily redoing certain actions. It might be safe for some subset of commands, but I'd be vary wary about specifying that subset. Getting it wrong is going to cause a lot of pain. Thanks Neil