
No, the type instance must match the class heading.
I *can* use
instance Foo [_a] where
type Bar [_a] = Int
whatever = ... where
bar :: _a -> Int
bar = ...
but that is a needlessly messy thing to request of every package everywhere.
The arguments being pattern matched in a class associated type aren't
really just bindings, they reference the surrounding context and so
shouldn't be treated the same as the basic type family case.
It isn't just the class associated type being mangled, it is every type
variable that comes from the instance head in the entire body of every
instance that happens to have a class associated type in it.
Note that in the example above I added another ScopedTypeVariables
reference to the same parameter, but it _also_ must be mangled despite
having absolutely nothing to do with the class associated type.
The existing convention has worked since 6.10 or so, when all of this stuff
was invented in the first place, and the new state of affairs is clearly
worse.
-Edward
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Farmer
Can't you just:
instance Foo [a] where type Bar [_a] = Int
(At least I think I did that somewhere...) On Jan 16, 2016 9:24 PM, "Edward Kmett"
wrote: As a data point I now get thousands of occurrences of this warning across my packages.
It is quite annoying.
class Foo a where type Bar a
instance Foo [a] where type Bar [a] = Int
is enough to trigger it.
And you can't turn it off by using _ as
instance Foo [_] where type Bar [_] = Int
isn't legal.
I've been avoiding it for now by using
if impl(ghc >= 8)
ghc-options: -fno-warn-unused-matches
but this is a pretty awful addition to this warning as it stands. -Edward
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Henning Thielemann < lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
On Jan 9, 2016, at 6:44 PM, Henning Thielemann <
lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
instance (Natural n) => Num.Integer (Un n) where type Repr (Un _n) = Unary
GHC-7.6.3 and GHC-7.4.2 complain: Type indexes must match class instance head Found `Un _n' but expected `Un n' In the type synonym instance declaration for `Num.Repr' In the instance declaration for `Num.Integer (Un n)'
GHC-7.8.4, GHC-7.10.3 and GHC-8.0 are happy with the difference.
I'm surprised this is accepted at all. Looks like hogwash to me. I think you should post a bug report.
Ok, but then GHC must not warn about the unused argument of Repr.
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users