22 Sep
2009
22 Sep
'09
2:34 p.m.
I'm thinking it would be expedient to omit Haddock while building a ghc 6.11 snapshot, per bug ticket #3531
From my basic understanding of its purpose there, that ought to work out fine - I mean, not to undervalue documentation, but the compiler should be able to function without it. But not well versed in the intricacies of the GHC build, so please set me straight if I'm about to waste a lot of time untangling it in the makefiles.
thanks! Donn Cave, donn@avvanta.com