On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 15:42 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Ah, sorry, my mistake, I hadn't pulled the latest patch. OK, so in principle I'd be fine with 0.3, except if we want to move to 4-component version numbers then we need to use 0.3.0.1 anyway (I don't think having both 0.3 and 0.3.0.0 which don't compare equal is a good idea. We'll just get confused).
========== X11
HEAD repo: http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/X11 Released version: 1.2.3 (on hackage) Current version: 1.2.3 Changes since: none Suggested next version: not needed PVP next version: not needed
1.2.3.1
Again, there are no patches since the patch that tagged version 1.2.3, so no new release is needed.
Again, this is just for the version number length.
Ah yes. Fair enough. If we agree in the end that we are going with the package versioning policy then we should do it consistently for the core libs and those included in the extralibs distribution. I agree with the package versioning policy but I don't think we've heard enough of a consensus yet to be confident that people agree that it is the right thing to do. Duncan