RE: Network, sClose

On 11 August 2004 18:24, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:

"Jon Fairbairn" writes:

...

[1] What's the "Do" doing there anyway? You end up writing withSocketsDo$do, and we could do without the Do$do.

Yes, that just doesn't fly, does it? withSocketsDo in user code became superfluous a couple of releases back.

Interesting. Why is it superfluous? Should it be made a no-op? Shouldn't we at least document that it isn't required any more? Cheers, Simon