27 Oct
2014
27 Oct
'14
9:41 a.m.
Hi Tom, +1
There's a little bit of bikeshedding that needs to happen (e.g. is "hiding (Foo (..))" sufficient to hide the type Foo and not just its constructors), but are people +1 on this? I've frequently wanted this behavior.
I would be surprised if 'Foo(..)' would mean in this case something different, so yes, the type Foo should be hidden too. Greetings, Daniel