
That makes sense: MonomorphismRestriction makes bindings without parameters
monomorphic, and MonoLocalBinds makes local bindings monomorphic. So either
one will make this binding monomorphic. Only when both are off does it
become polymorphic and does the error occur.
Erik
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Roman Cheplyaka
Right. What I meant is that with -XMonomorphismRestriction, it compiles with with both -XMonoLocalBinds and -XNoMonoLocalBinds.
That means that MonoLocalBinds can not be solely responsible for this behaviour.
Anyway, I just noticed that a very similar example (using Read) is described in the Haskell report's section on the monomorphism restriction.
Roman
* Erik Hesselink
[2012-11-11 16:43:20+0100] That's strange. Here, it only fails with both NoMonomorphismRestriction and NoMonoLocalBinds (which makes sense). I've tested on 7.4.1 and 7.6.1.
Erik
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Roman Cheplyaka
wrote: Apparently not — the code comilers with any of -XNoMonoLocalBinds and -XMonoLocalBinds, but not with -XNoMonomorphismRestriction.
* wagnerdm@seas.upenn.edu
[2012-11-09 14:07:59-0500] It's possible that the below blog post is related. ~d
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/LetGeneralisationInGhc7
Quoting Roman Cheplyaka
: For this module
module Test where
import System.Random
data RPS = Rock | Paper | Scissors deriving (Show, Enum)
instance Random RPS where random g = let (x, g') = randomR (0, 2) g in (toEnum x, g') randomR = undefined
ghc (7.4.1 and 7.6.1) reports an error:
rand.hs:9:9: No instance for (Random t0) arising from the ambiguity check for g' The type variable `t0' is ambiguous Possible fix: add a type signature that fixes these type variable(s) Note: there are several potential instances: instance Random RPS -- Defined at rand.hs:7:10 instance Random Bool -- Defined in `System.Random' instance Random Foreign.C.Types.CChar -- Defined in `System.Random' ...plus 34 others When checking that g' has the inferred type `g' Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous In the expression: let (x, g') = randomR (0, 2) g in (toEnum x, g') In an equation for `random': random g = let (x, g') = randomR ... g in (toEnum x, g') Failed, modules loaded: none.
There should be no ambiguity since 'toEnum' determines the type of x (Int), and that in turn fixes types of 0 and 2. Interestingly, annotating 0 or 2 with the type makes the problem go away.
jhc 0.8.0 compiles this module fine.
Roman
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users