Claus Reinke wrote:
Thank you all. Everything is great now. It was because (Just ghcPath) was not passed into runGhc, and lack of ghc-path.
btw: is ghc-path going to be part of the ghc release or the haskell platform? Currently, I can't see it in either, which would be a pity. I thought the idea was to provide it in the ghc release, but not install it (since cabal install isn't going to be part of the ghc release after all).
I don't think we use ghc-paths in GHC's Haddock now (Ian - correct me if I'm wrong). And it's hard to provide ghc-paths with a GHC installation, because it would have to be built at install-time, or at least binary-patched. So I think we decided it was easiest to just let the user install it with cabal-install later. Cheers, Simon