21 Apr
2011
21 Apr
'11
11:29 a.m.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Simon Marlow
Right, it could be related to this. However this change was made to eliminate some causes of NaNs, see:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4914
So I'm very depressed if it managed to introduce NaNs somehow.
Could someone make a ticket for this, with the smallest test case found so far please?
So in principle the LLVM backend should be fine? Thanks, -- Felipe.