Re: testsuite results

On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:49:16, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

| hpc_markup_multi_001(normal) | hpc_markup_multi_002(normal) | hpc_markup_multi_003(normal) | | Unexpected passes: | mc01(hpc,ghci) | mc06(hpc,ghci) | mc08(hpc,ghci) | mc11(hpc) | mc16(hpc) | mc18(hpc)

I pushed patches for all of these today

Great! Now I've built HEAD (7b3a746294d3d034da0052644237e4d1ab1f08c8, minus the patch removing the import Config from AsmCodeGen, cf #5194) with profiling, leading to ==================== OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Do 12. Mai 20:47:35 CEST 2011 2766 total tests, which gave rise to 11839 test cases, of which 0 caused framework failures 2123 were skipped 9428 expected passes 280 expected failures 1 unexpected passes 7 unexpected failures ==================== Unexpected passes: conc016(threaded2) Well, that one occasionally happens. ==================== Unexpected failures: T3016(profasm) timeout-killed, too much other stuff running, rerunning T3016 on a less busy machine made it pass, but I'm not too happy with the stats: <> ==================== T3064(normal) This one failed due to ghc being too good: bytes allocated 59305220 is less than minimum allowed 65000000 If this is because you have improved GHC, please update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again *** unexpected failure for T3064(normal) On an almost idle machine, the figures are even lower: [("bytes allocated", "58378436") ,("num_GCs", "30") ,("average_bytes_used", "1594860") ,("max_bytes_used", "3064640") ,("num_byte_usage_samples", "2") ,("peak_megabytes_allocated", "8") ,("init_cpu_seconds", "0.00") ,("init_wall_seconds", "0.00") ,("mutator_cpu_seconds", "0.16") ,("mutator_wall_seconds", "0.17") ,("GC_cpu_seconds", "0.07") ,("GC_wall_seconds", "0.07") ] ==================== T5084(normal) dph-diophantine-opt(normal,threaded1,threaded2) The same as before, nothing to worry about. ==================== dph-words-opt(normal) This one was also timeout-killed on a busy machine, a later re-run let the compilation finish, but it took quite long: [1 of 2] Compiling WordsVect ( WordsVect.hs, WordsVect.o ) [2 of 2] Compiling Main ( Main.hs, Main.o ) Linking dph-words-opt ... <> The run of the programme again ended with an invalid slice. ====================

| Summing up: Yay!

Indeed!

Still very much yay, I can't find the new unexpected failure of T3064 disappointing in the least, only T3016(profasm) and dph-words-opt leave something to be desired.