Hello Brian, Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 6:26:02 PM, you wrote:
the idea is not "what we all use", but "what a required to build ghc itself, or closely depend on ghc version". i instead may propose to remove unix/win32 here - i guess that these packages are rather independent on GHC version
Ok I see now, that the whole point is to avoid having to download everything every time the ghc version changes, so I withdraw my suggestion about including mtl in the core :-)
to be exact, problem is not downloading, but separating libraries from the core package so they can be developed and updated independently. fo example, you can update mtl from 2.0 to 3.0 version while using still ghc 6.6 you installed four years ago. now library versions are fixed at moment of major GHC release (6.4/6.6/..) and don't changed during year or two -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com