On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 17:07 +0100, Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
Would a new and expanded Regex package (Test.Regex.Lazy) be something that could be included in the 6.6.0 libraries? What is the best practice for getting it included?
It still supports a wrapped Posix regex backend, but also include a PCRE wrapper and pure haskell backends and work efficiently on both String and ByteString.
It runs, has an increasing amount of Haddock documentation, some HUnit tests, and some new QuickCheck tests are almost done.
Wouldn't it be nice to use Ville Laurikari's TRE package instead of PCRE? [It is also Posix compliant and drop in replacement for gnu regex .. as well as supporting nice extensions] -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net