On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:00:42PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 14:11 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
If anyone sees any problems with my suggested version numbers below, please shout.
I've CCed all addresses listed as Cabal maintainers of extralibs; please let us know if you disagree with the versions we propose to use for your packages.
Only two minor points...
========== arrows
HEAD repo: http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/arrows Released version: 0.3 (on hackage) Current version: 0.3 Changes since release: none Suggested next version: not needed PVP next version: not needed
There have been some patches to the repo, so I think it would be nice to make a new tarball, and it's not that expensive, so I'd suggest 0.3.0.1.
There are no patches since the one that increased the version number from 0.2.1 to 0.3. No new release is needed at the moment.
Ah, sorry, my mistake, I hadn't pulled the latest patch. OK, so in principle I'd be fine with 0.3, except if we want to move to 4-component version numbers then we need to use 0.3.0.1 anyway (I don't think having both 0.3 and 0.3.0.0 which don't compare equal is a good idea. We'll just get confused).
========== X11
HEAD repo: http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/X11 Released version: 1.2.3 (on hackage) Current version: 1.2.3 Changes since: none Suggested next version: not needed PVP next version: not needed
1.2.3.1
Again, there are no patches since the patch that tagged version 1.2.3, so no new release is needed.
Again, this is just for the version number length. Thanks Ian