8 Nov
2006
8 Nov
'06
8:30 a.m.
Ross Paterson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:53:55PM +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
Incedentally, this is also one reason I think lazy I/O is a wart (despite its obvious usefulness): because it necessarily requires talking about evaluation order.
What is lazy output? Buffering?
Well ok, "lazy I" then :-) Cheers, Simon