Re: Unit unboxed tuples

10 Jan 2012

      Copying the list, sorry. I have a lot of trouble replying correctly
with gmail's interface for some reason. :)

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Dan Doel  wrote:
...
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Simon Marlow  wrote:
...
On 09/01/2012 04:46, wren ng thornton wrote:
...
Shouldn't (# T #) be identical to T?
No, because (# T #) is unlifted, whereas T is lifted.  In operational terms,
a function that returns (# T #) does not evaluate the T before returning it,
but a function returning T does.  This is used in GHC for example to fetch a
value from an array without evaluating it, for example:
 indexArray :: Array# e -> Int# -> (# e #)
I don't really understand this explanation. (# T #) being unlifted
would mean it's isomorphic to T under the correspondence e <-> (# e
#). _|_ = (# _|_ #) : (# T #), so this works.

Does the difference have to do with unboxed types? For instance:

   foo :: () -> Int#
   foo _ = foo ()
   bar :: () -> (# Int# #)
   bar _ = (# foo () #)

   baz = case bar () of _ -> 5  -- 5
   quux = case foo () of _ -> 5 -- non-termination

Because in that case, either (# Int# #) is lifted, or the Int# is
effectively lifted when inside the unboxed tuple. The latter is a bit
of an oddity.

-- Dan