Re: Haddock, .lhs, and GHC

I never thought about that. I've been using Setup.hs with "#!/usr/bin/env runhaskell" and never had any problems.

I guess the only thing that would be gained by using Setup.lhs is the ability to compile the setup program. Is that something that's commonly done?

That's what I do. My normal install procedure is: ghc --make setup setup configure setup build setup install If only takes a couple of seconds for ghc to compile setup, and then it runs instantly. If I was to use runghc then it would recompile (in ghci) for each invocation. I use #! in Setup.hs (non-lit) and it compiles fine, so no worries there either. Alistair