Yes, i got SSE to work with C++ with -march=pentium3 and -mfpmath=sse
Well, don't make a difference for C++. It is still stuck at 140ms. But i
must say that
the speedup could be below the time resolution of my PC + Test. It is
assumable that
the improvement is similar to Haskell (about 4%)
|---------+----------------------------------------->
| | Michael Weber |
| |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | An: Andreas.Schroeder@gillardon.de | | Kopie: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | | Thema: Re: Faster, GHC, and floating point. | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
* Andreas.Schroeder@gillardon.de [2003-10-21T11:39+0200]:
Now, Haskell takes 4.57 the time of C++ (cygwin gnu C++ with -O2).
Did you add the SSE options etc. to the C++ program as well when comparing Haskell vs. C++? What is the SSE speedup of C++ vs. C++/with SSE? Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users