28 Apr
2008
28 Apr
'08
9:09 p.m.
ndmitchell:
Hi
That would work on GHC, but not on Hugs.
Optimisation and Hugs don't go together anyway.
I want the code to work on Hugs, and perform fast on GHC. As it turns out, for this particular application, Hugs is faster than GHCi by about 25%.
Optimisation and ghci don't go together, so I don't know what your point is there. Anyway, its the same with ByteString -- we have it work in ghci or hugs or nhc, but its only worth actually optimising for GHC. -- Don