Re: Future of DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS?

Simon Marlow-7 wrote

Is it just shortage of space, or is there anything else that pushes you towards DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS=NO? Isn't disk space cheap?

Disc space is prohibitively expensive for zero-budget open source projects deployed to the free tier of cloud computing providers. We typically get 1Gb for everything, including GHC, third-party libraries, our own code, and data. A full install of GHC is nearly 1Gb by itself. -- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Future-of-DYNAMIC-GHC-PROGRAMS-tp574979... Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.