
Building with -package-name comlib-0.1 helps. I saw that Cabal from
HEAD is passing the full package id to GHC but the version compiled in
ghc-6.5.20061001 is passing just the package name. Maybe the change
wasn't merged in GHC-6.6 branch or the bundle wasn't build from the
actual sources.
Cheers,
Krasimir
On 10/4/06, Krasimir Angelov
On 10/4/06, Ian Lynagh
wrote: Did it work with earlier RCs?
It was working with a version slightly older than RC1. Definitely with a version without the advanced packages support.
Does comlib get wired into the compiler at all? I had a similar problem with base, where the compiler had the package name wired in: compiler/main/PackageConfig.hs: basePackageId = fsToPackageId FSLIT("base") but cabal was building it with -package-name base-2.0 To solve it I put -package-name base in ghc-options in the cabal file.
Thanks Ian
I am sure comlib isn't wired into the compiler. Perhaps there is a problem with Cabal somewhere. I will try to put custom -package-name option. If that works I will take a look into Cabal.
Cheers, Krasimir