14 Nov
2002
14 Nov
'02
5:01 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:56:13PM -0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
Absolutely. I didn't mean to sound so GHC-centric. It would be great if the same infrastructure supports multiple compilers/interpreters.
On the other hand, my impression is that if someone did something that worked with GHC it would be fairly easy to adapt to Hugs, probably with a script that preprocessed a tree of modules. The exception is modules that need extra command-line arguments, particularly FFI modules. For those, Hugs needs a mechanism to set options on a per-file and per-hierarchy basis.