8 Jul
2016
8 Jul
'16
5:32 a.m.
2016-07-08 9:09 GMT+02:00 Joachim Breitner
Am Freitag, den 08.07.2016, 08:35 +0200 schrieb Sven Panne:
foobar do f &&& g x [...] Only with the proposed addition, it becomes an argument to foobar. [...]
Huh? Nope! The Wiki page explicitly says that do f &&& g x means (f &&& g) x Why should this be different here? Simply writing "foobar" above that construct won't trigger any special layout rules, I hope...