On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:30:10PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi Simon,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2012, 12:15 +0100 schrieb Simon Hengel:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:20:35AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
there really a change to the on-disk format of the .haddock files?
Yes, the on-disk format changed, hence the interface version was bumped from 21 to 22. But Haddock can still read files with interface version 21 (see [1]).
great! I was considering asking for backwards compatibility, but then tought it might be a bit too much.
For now I’ll hardcode the information that haddock support interface version 21 in our package metadata, but this is error prone. Would you mind adding an option akin to $ haddock --interface-version that would print all versions (e.g. space separated)?
$ haddock --compatible-interface-versions 21 22
Should be easy. Can you open a ticket? (of course, patches are always welcome ;) Cheers, Simon