The order if bindings generated by GHC

I use STG-bindings generated by GHC during CoreToSTG phase. What is the order of this bindings is it random or does it correspond to original source code or does it reflect the dependency structure of the program? If I define the following in my program: data Numeral = Zero | Succ Numeral zero = Zero one = Succ zero ... ten = Succ nine the order of zero .. ten definition will remain the same, but the special Zero binding will be generated and added to the end of the bindings list. But Zero is used by binding of one (strangely enough) so order doesn't reflect dependency. What is the order of bindings? If I need the order reflecting dependency, should I sort it myself by SRT tables or there is an easier way? -- vir http://vir.comtv.ru/