1 Apr
2015
1 Apr
'15
8:36 a.m.
Roman Cheplyaka-2 wrote
I'm not denying (or confirming) your claim, but it would look more legitimate if you compared the same version of Cabal compiled with different versions of GHC.
At least some of this bloat could be because Cabal simply gained more code.
Tricky to test that because of dependencies and global package db. I haven't measured the amount of code in Cabal, but I doubt it's increased that much, and there has been a big jump in the installed size of every library. -- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Binary-bloat-in-7-10-tp5768067p5768080.... Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.