On 21 June 2005 12:47, Ketil Malde wrote:

Marco Morazan writes:

...

Do any of you have insight into why GHC uses GMP as opposed to another library for arbitrary precision numbers?

Did you have any particular other library in mind? I'm not too well-versed in this, but I think GMP is fairly efficient, well tested and portable. So why not?

Right - that's three reasons to use it. Some reasons *not* to use it are: it has an awkward license, it's big, it needs updating, and we run into problems when the Haskell program wants to use GMP itself via the FFI (it's possible by essentially renaming everything in our local copy of GMP so it doesn't conflict, but we haven't done that). There are other good bignum libraries out there: the one that comes with OpenSSL springs to mind. Cheers, Simon