I don't know about Cabal, but probably a Cabal-er can reply. Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: glasgow-haskell-users-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- | bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Serge D. Mechveliani | Sent: 05 June 2006 13:45 | To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: recursive import | | Concering the current state of recursive import, | Simon Peyton-Jones writes on 5 Jun 2006 | | > [..] | > | > GHC's module-at-a-time compilation model means that GHC needs an hs-boot | > file to "get started". The manual tries to explain what you can and | > can't do. If you follow the rules it works pretty well. We use | > recursive modules extensively for compiling GHC itself, and it's just | > fine with 'make'. (ghc -M does the right thing.) | > | > [..] | | | Thank you for the explanation. | | And how does this feature interact with packages, with making via | Cabal ? Will Cabal work with recursive imports and with | | ghc-options: | -fglasgow-exts -fallow-undecidable-instances | -fallow-overlapping-instances -fno-warn-overlapping-patterns | -fwarn-unused-binds -fwarn-unused-matches -fwarn-unused-imports | -O | -prof -auto-all | ? | | Generally, I tend to use recursive modules because they simplify | the global algorithm presentation. But fear of technical | difficulties in the project support. Maybe, I would try this | recursion. | | ----------------- | Serge Mechveliani | mechvel@botik.ru | | | _______________________________________________ | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users