
29 Jul
2002
29 Jul
'02
5:21 a.m.
| :browse Some.Long.Module.Name | | but not | | :browse N | | which would be really nice :P | | if this could make its way into 5.04.1, that would be wonderful It turns out that the impl isn't structured with a separate modulename->modulename mapping so it would not be simple to implement. For example, what if two modules whose top level scopes you have open use the same abbreviation for a different module. Yes, we could arrange to emit an ambiguous-ref message, but it's all work. So I'm not enthusiastic, I'm afraid. Simon
8332
Age (days ago)
8332
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Simon Peyton-Jones