Re: FW: [GHC] #916: windows installer should play nice with otherHaskell tools

Simon, Sigbjorn,
we have updated the wiki page http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Installers
and would welcome your feedback. (only cc-ed to ghc-users for now,
as ghc's is the next installer to be expected; once ghc is on board, we
can ask others)
Initially, we were tempted to try and specify some ideal installation
world, but that turned out to be complicated and unlikely to be
something all Haskellers could agree on. So we chose to tackle
the issue from the other side instead, trying to pin down the issues
on which different installers must not get in each other's way.
An oversimplified micro-summary is "hands off, unless the user
wants it" - installers should agree on a common file type, lest they
disable each other inadvertedly, and they should permit users to
bypass file name extension association, file type action registration
(right-click menu), and setting of the default action (double-click).
That should hopefully enable initial conformance with minimal
changes, as the next release is imminent (though I'm led to believe
that nothing is straightforward about creating Windows installers;-).
Once the various installers no longer get in each other's way,
things can grow from there, later.
Over to you,
Claus and Neil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Peyton-Jones"

Hi,
(only cc-ed to ghc-users for now, as ghc's is the next installer to be expected; once ghc is on board, we can ask others)
I am in control of the Hugs and Yhc installers (which I think covers most of the other Haskell installers), so you can say they are on-board as well :) Thanks Neil
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Peyton-Jones"
To: "Claus Reinke" ; "Neil Mitchell" Cc: "Sigbjorn Finne" Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:38 AM Subject: RE: FW: [GHC] #916: windows installer should play nice with otherHaskell tools Claus, Neil
This is all v helpful. Can you let Sigbjorn (and me) know when you have converged to a common mind, so that he can think about how to implement it? No point in doing work until there is an agreed spec!
Thanks
Simon
participants (2)
-
Claus Reinke
-
Neil Mitchell