Hello Thomas, On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:03, Thomas Schilling wrote:

There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the toplevel or within the tests directory. Could you search for "apirecomp001" and send me the test output from running that test. I can't reproduce this failure when running it manually even though I'm on OS X, too.

Several of the buildbot slaves fail the apirecomp001(normal) test as well. For eaxmple, here is the output from http://darcs.haskell.org/buildbot/all/builders/tnaur%20x86%20Linux%20head/bu... for that test: =====> apirecomp001(normal) cd ./ghc-api/apirecomp001 && $MAKE -s --no-print-directory apirecomp001 apirecomp001.run.stdout 2>apirecomp001.run.stderr Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 ) Stdout: Stderr: make[1]: myghc: Command not found make[1]: *** [apirecomp001] Error 127 *** unexpected failure for apirecomp001(normal)

On 18 Mar 2009, at 10:51, Gregory Wright wrote:

...

I built ghc-6.10.1.20090314 on OS X 10.5.6 (Intel) using ghc 6.8.2 as a bootstrap compiler. The build was done using the MacPorts infrastructure.

Summary test results:

OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Tue Mar 17 15:31:38 EDT 2009 2334 total tests, which gave rise to 12487 test cases, of which 0 caused framework failures 2460 were skipped

9709 expected passes 258 expected failures 0 unexpected passes 60 unexpected failures

Unexpected failures: 2469(ghci) apirecomp001(normal)

bits (normal ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded) conc049(hpc) conc068(normal) derefnull(profc,profthreaded) divbyzero(profc,profthreaded)

genUpTo (normal ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded) length001(optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,threaded2,profthreaded)

num009 (normal ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)

num012 (normal ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded) signals002(ghci) signals004(ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)

I haven't looked at the errors in detail, but generally the release candidate seems OK.

BTW, a test target will be added to MacPorts's portfile for the 6.10.2 release, which will let you run the test suite by typing

...

sudo port test ghc

and if you then install the tested build, a record of the test will be saved in $PREFIX/share/ghc-<version>/.

Best Wishes, Greg

_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

/ Thomas -- Push the envelope. Watch it bend.

Best regards Thorkil

Hi Thomas, On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the toplevel or within the tests directory. Could you search for "apirecomp001" and send me the test output from running that test. I can't reproduce this failure when running it manually even though I'm on OS X, too.

I get: ====> Running ./ghc-api/apirecomp001/all.T =====> apirecomp001(normal)cd ./ghc-api/apirecomp001 && $MAKE -s --no- print-directory apirecomp001 apirecomp001.run.stdout 2>apirecomp001.run.stderr Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 ) Stdout: Stderr: ld warning: atom sorting error for _ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizutype_closure_tbl and _ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizucif_closure_tbl in /opt/local/ var/macports/build/_Users_gwright_src_macports-trunk_dports_lang_ghc- beta/work/ghc-6.10.1.20090314/compiler/dist-stage2/build/ libHSghc-6.10.1.20090314.a(LibFFI.o) ld warning: atom sorting error for _ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizutype_closure_tbl and _ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizucif_closure_tbl in /opt/local/ var/macports/build/_Users_gwright_src_macports-trunk_dports_lang_ghc- beta/work/ghc-6.10.1.20090314/compiler/dist-stage2/build/ libHSghc-6.10.1.20090314.a(LibFFI.o) make[2]: myghc: Command not found make[2]: *** [apirecomp001] Error 127 *** unexpected failure for apirecomp001(normal) Best Wishes, Greg

Ian Lynagh wrote:

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:51:31AM -0400, Gregory Wright wrote:

...

Unexpected failures: 2469(ghci)

This is http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2789 (which is fixed in the new build system).

...

apirecomp001(normal)

This is failing because of "ld: atom sorting error for ..." on OS X http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2578 (I'd love for someone to fix that).

...

bits genUpTo

These are fixed.

...

num009 num012

These still need to be fixed, but I'm pretty sure they aren't regressions.

I have a fix for num012 (the test is broken), but I still don't know what's going on with num009. Cheers, Simon

Max Bolingbroke wrote:

2009/3/27 Simon Marlow :

...

I have a fix for num012 (the test is broken), but I still don't know what's going on with num009.

num009 has been broken on OS X for as long as I can remember :-).

If it is any help, I can confirm that num009 works correctly on a PowerPC Mac with both ghc-6.8.2 and 6.10.1, but it fails on an Intel Mac at least as far back as ghc-6.8.3. Regards, Malcolm