RE: GHC 6.4.1 on Solaris x86
On 16 November 2005 13:18, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 12:59 +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14 November 2005 04:17, Ben Horsfall wrote:
Is there a binary package for GHC 6.4.1 on Solaris x86 (Sun OS 5.9)?
Building from source fails thus:
../../ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace -optc-O -optc-Wall -optc-W -optc-Wstrict-prototypes -optc-Wmissing-prototypes -optc-Wmissing-declarations -optc-Winline -optc-Waggregate-return -optc-Wbad-function-cast -optc-I../includes -optc-I. -optc-Iparallel -optc-DCOMPILING_RTS -optc-fomit-frame-pointer -H16m -O -O2 -static -I. -#include Prelude.h -#include Rts.h -#include RtsFlags.h -#include RtsUtils.h -#include StgRun.h -#include Schedule.h -#include Printer.h -#include Sanity.h -#include STM.h -#include Storage.h -#include SchedAPI.h -#include Timer.h -#include Itimer.h -#include ProfHeap.h -#include LdvProfile.h -#include Profiling.h -#include Apply.h -fvia-C -dcmm-lint -c StgCRun.c -o StgCRun.o Assembler: StgCRun.c "/tmp/ghc14327.s", line 18 : Illegal mnemonic "/tmp/ghc14327.s", line 18 : Syntax error "/tmp/ghc14327.s", line 18 : Illegal mnemonic make[2]: *** [StgCRun.o] Error 1
There isn't a binary for 6.4.1 that I know of. You should be able to follow the porting instructions in the Building Guide to get an unregisterised version going (get the version from CVS, there were some recent modifications).
My department uses 6.4.1 on Solaris 9 and it works nicely. They built it from source using version 6.2.2 (for which there are binaries I believe). I don't think it's necessary to do a fresh port.
Ah good. Any chance of building a binary dist I can put up? Cheers, Simon
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 15:40 +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 16 November 2005 13:18, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 12:59 +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14 November 2005 04:17, Ben Horsfall wrote:
Is there a binary package for GHC 6.4.1 on Solaris x86 (Sun OS 5.9)?
My department uses 6.4.1 on Solaris 9 and it works nicely. They built it from source using version 6.2.2 (for which there are binaries I believe). I don't think it's necessary to do a fresh port.
Ah good. Any chance of building a binary dist I can put up?
Oh sorry. I just re-read the original message. Ben said Solaris x86. Our lab is using Solaris Sparc. Sorry about that. Duncan
participants (2)
-
Duncan Coutts -
Simon Marlow