Re: [Haskell-cafe] high probability of installation problems and quality of the glorious implementation

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:35 PM, John Dorsey wrote:

Once it's installed and working, GHC's a very decent compiler.

My general null hypothesis is, as Alec Baldwin put it, that a loser is a loser, or a buggy project is buggy. If GHC is robust overall (which I'm yet to find out), why is the installation so broken?